Run AI visibility as a repeatable service. Across every client account.
Klariton measures per client account how assistants see, read and sell the brand. Agencies run measurement, controlled answers and revenue proof as a standardised service across many mandates, instead of handling every client by hand.
- Clients ask for AI visibility, but there is no measurable offering that sells as a retainer and can be proven month after month.
- Every mandate is handled separately: no unified view across accounts, no repeatable report, high manual effort per client.
- The proof of value is missing: the client cannot see whether work on content and product data actually moves answers and revenue.
- Approvals and claims run unregulated: published answers per client without control over rulebook, brand and legally sensitive statements.
- New clients get pitched with a promise instead of a measurable finding about the technical readability of their domain.
Why a general-purpose chat assistant is not enough here
A chatbot per client is a one-off project, not a service module. What is missing is the repeatable part: the same baseline finding across all mandates, the same rules, the same evidence in the monthly report. Klariton provides that frame, including the approval step. That nothing goes live without confirmation is not a detail towards your client, it is your safeguard.
The relevant question changes with the decision phase.
How can we modernise our customer portal without rebuilding every process?
A reliable answer is generated from the company’s approved sources. This example intentionally does not use invented answers or sources.
Test with your own sources →What agencies solve with Klariton across client accounts
- I want to set up a recurring AI-readiness retainer across several client accounts. How do I standardise measurement, governance and reporting?
- A client asks: am I named in ChatGPT and Perplexity, and with what statements? How do I deliver that reliably and repeatably?
- How do I show a client with evidence that our content and data work changed answers and chat-attributed revenue?
- How do I make sure published answers per client match the rulebook and the permitted claims of that brand?
- How do I start a new mandate with a technical finding on schema, JS crawling and bot reads instead of a claim?
Which Klariton modules matter here
Shows per client which AI bots really read the content, giving you the hard baseline finding for every new mandate.
Delivers ongoing visibility per client and becomes the basis for recurring reports and the value of the retainer.
Keeps rulebook, claims and approvals separate per brand, so published answers stay controlled across many clients.
Reports chat-attributed revenue per client and makes the value of the work defensible towards them.
What improves
- AI visibility becomes a repeatable, sellable retainer service with one consistent report across all client accounts.
- Every mandate starts with a measurable AI-readiness finding instead of a promise.
- Published answers stay within rulebook, claims and approvals for each brand.
- The client sees evidence that the work moves answers and chat-attributed revenue.
Fits into your existing stack.
- Contentful AppApp ready · Marketplace review pending
- Public Read APILive
- Schema Export APILive
- Reach Beacon SDK (@klariton/beacon)Live
- Next.js Middleware HelperLive
- React/Next.js Touchpoint SDKComing soon
- Website embed (<klariton-widget>)Live
- Website / URLLive